J.A.I.L. Epitomizes The Most Basic Of All Our Rights
That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
--DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE --(1776) --
Ladies and gentlemen: Have those circumstances developed into full bloom, and have they existed for many decades? If so, it is time for all People to exercise that ultimate right to alter or amend their government so they can exercise all other rights in our Constitutional Republic. J.A.I.L. epitomizes the right of the People to alter or amend / reform government when the above circumstances have occurred; and it must be passed in all states. J.A.I.L. does not require approval by legislatures. It is the Duty of the People.
Not once, but twice the Declaration states, specifically and separately from all other rights, THE right of the People (1) "to alter or to abolish [government]" when it becomes destructive of its just powers to protect the rights of the People, and (2) "to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security" when a long history of abuses and usurpations causes the People to live under absolute despotism. The second mention of that right states in the Declaration that it is the People's DUTY to do so.
More than an inherent right, it is the duty of the People to alter or amend their government when they deem it necessary to do so for the future protection of their rights. Note that I did not say for the future protection of the People, but the future protection of their rights.
State courts are created by the legislature. State judges, therefore, are NOT judicial officers, and are not independent, but
have conflicts of interest inherent in their job! What does it say on their paycheck about who pays them? They take a
loyalty oath to the State. The State owns the judges, the court, all the attorneys, and they are the plaintiff trying their own